Monday, December 29, 2008

Things one shouldn't do while on holiday

When one gets the chance to sit round, drink beer in the sun and do not much, one's brain tends to wander off into all sorts of weird and wonderful places. At the moment its trying to convince me that this is a good idea for a layout. Maybe its because I have a copy of Noel Cameron's updated 'Rimutaka Railway' in front of me.


Yes, dear readers, I'm just as concerned as you.

Actually, thinking a bit further ( and maybe because I have not had a beer yet today), what are the real problems with this whole set up? Modeling cross creek is not a big problem, its actually a small yard ( having been to see the real thing I was struck by just how small it really was). The loco depot is quite big and until it closed was also the depot for south Wairarapa, so not just H's were stabled there.
There's a good selection of trains through. Every train needs to be re-arranged before it leaves. This can also be considered a drawback.
The layout would have to be a stand alone, as there is no way it could function as part of a modular set up. First off theres the center rail, which would preclude other locos running on it (not much space under your typical N gauge loco these days).
You would need a fiddle yard at one end, and you would probably have to handle the locos and wagons all the time ( sounds easy, but its how things get broke). You could possibly model summit as well, but I have not thought much about the type of operations at that end.
The number of operator required to run something like this, unless you are good at doing DCC consisting on the fly, or are a member of a large family (I suspect if you did carry it off, there would be no shortage of people wanting to operate though)
The main problem is the loco's and their collection of 'jiggly' bits.


While its not the best picture, it shows that a certain Mr Widmark decided back in 1875 to annoy future generations of modelers by hanging something that should be well hidden out for all to see (he was Swedish, maybe that explains it). That Stephenson's valve gear is a bugger. Now I know people have done it (even in 2mm scale of all things) but I think if they ever went to court charged with murder they could use the model in evidence for an insanity plea.

On the plus side, the H is a big loco, so there's no problem fitting an engine in there, and also possibly a sound decoder and a speaker as well (and that would be impressive if you could get the odd syncopated beat that they had, plus a wheelslip noise). They also have the same wheelbase (well the driven wheels) as an atlas GP38, so that's all the gearing done in one foul swoop. The wheels are split frame, approximately the correct diameter, and its possible to knock the steel axles out and replace them with something a bit more solder friendly.
See, I've done a lot of drinking ah thinking about this. The only question I have now, is will I be good at basket weaving at the funny farm.

4 comments:

lalover said...

GP-38's Hmmm
You could build twi 'H' body's to fit over a complete GP chassis and fill the bit in the middle with a representation of a Fell van.
Damm fell off the cane bar stool...

RAB said...

And you sir, are drunk; I am mearly insane :v)
It would never work for assending trains.

Kiwibonds said...

How about dummy H's and powered carriages/Z vans then? Obviously shunting would be out of the question! But you could model prearranges trains coming out from behind the depot (from a staging yard) and winding up into the summit tunnel (another staging yard or helix down to the bottom)?

RAB said...

I think that getting a dummy H to run freely would be far harder than having a bit of friction in the mechanism but forcing it to run anyway with a motor. Having said that I had considered making some dummy H's to shunt into the train.